![]() ![]() And it has my vote for being better looking. The first is even more reminiscent of a rangefinder with that chrome looking top area and the dark body. Leica-like in many waysįirst things first the way the camera handles is very reminiscent of rangefinders with the viewfinder being on the top corner. I’m a Leicaphile so I’d say as long as a camera is good, does it matter that much? 2. Does that make the Leica D-Lux 7 worth it or not? Up to you. If you can get past that fact, you have one of the best cameras you can get, Leica or not, you just need to know it’s not 100% a Leica. Why am I saying this? It is not that I am a Leica purist, it must be said because these cameras are on the fringe of the Leica world and don’t really represent it. There’s been quite a few cameras like this (the -lux series), the latest being the D-Lux 7 / Panasonic LX 100 II. The deal makes it so that Panasonic has their own version and Leica has their own version. Panasonic made a camera and they had to jump trough many hoops to get their camera and glass (lens) up to the standards of Leica and these are made in Japan. There’s also another camera line that are compact cameras, these are made with partnership with Panasonic and not full 100% Leicas. Leica has multiple camera lines, like the M series that are made in Germany. This is probably the only reason against the question is the Leica D-Lux 7 worth it. Hi, my name is Sven the Leicaphile and here’s a few things you need to know if you want to figure out is the Leica D-Lux7 worth it. If you can get past the fact that this is not a Leica from head to toe, this is one of the best compact cameras you can get, Leica or not. The Leica D-lux 7 is absolutely worth it without a doubt. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |